Malaysia edition · Pilot
Duede
Voter’s guideMy notebook

Voter’s guide

How to check a candidate before you vote

A short, practical method for doing your own due diligence on candidates and parties — what to look for, how much to trust what you read, and where to check it. About eight minutes to read.

Five steps

  1. 1Know who is on your ballot
  2. 2Check who they say they are
  3. 3Look at what they have done
  4. 4Check integrity — carefully
  5. 5Weigh it and decide
  1. 1

    Know who is on your ballot

    Confirm your parliamentary (P) and state (N) seats, then list every candidate and the party or coalition they stand for. The logo on the ballot is often the coalition, not the candidate's own party.

    Which seats am I voting in, and who exactly is standing?

    Where to check · SPR MySPR Semak for your registration and seats; this site's constituency pages.

  2. 2

    Check who they say they are

    Write down the claims each candidate makes about themselves — education, career, past roles — and check the important ones. Note mismatches, but don't assume bad faith: biographies are often copied with errors.

    Do their degree, jobs and titles check out against an official or institutional record?

    Where to check · Official biographies, government gazettes, university and professional bodies.

  3. 3

    Look at what they have done

    For people who have held office, judge the record, not the speeches: how they voted and spoke, what they promised and what was actually delivered. For newcomers, look at their work and community record.

    What did they promise last time, and what happened — announced, funded, built, working?

    Where to check · Parliament Hansard and state assembly records, Auditor-General reports, ministry releases.

  4. 4

    Check integrity — carefully

    Look for court cases, MACC (SPRM) action and audit findings, and always find out where each one ended. An allegation, an investigation, a charge and a conviction are four very different things.

    Is this an allegation, a charge or a conviction — and what was the final outcome?

    Where to check · MACC press statements, court judgments, Auditor-General and PAC reports.

  5. 5

    Weigh it and decide

    Decide what matters most to you, compare candidates on the same points, and write down your reasons. It is fine to be undecided while you wait for missing information.

    Given what I care about, which evidence actually changes my mind?

    Where to check · Your notebook on this site — pin evidence and record why it matters to you.

How much to trust what you read

Every piece of information sits somewhere on this ladder. The lower it sits, the more carefully you should word it — and the less it should decide your vote on its own.

More trustLess trust
  1. A
    Official record
    Treat as fact, in context.
  2. B
    Strongly corroborated
    Rely on it, but note what is still unconfirmed.
  3. C
    Credible but unproven
    Say “reported” or “alleged”. Not a fact yet.
  4. D
    Partisan
    A lead to check — not evidence.
  5. E
    Unverified
    Ignore until someone verifies it.
Allegation
Someone has made a claim. Nothing has been tested.
Investigation
An authority (police, MACC) is looking into it. Witnesses are investigated too.
Charge
Prosecutors believe there is a case to answer. The person is still presumed innocent.
Trial
Evidence is tested in court. Can take years.
Conviction
The only stage that is a finding of guilt.
Acquittal
Found not guilty. Counts as much as a charge did.
Withdrawn or no action
Can happen at any earlier stage.
Presumed innocent until a conviction — and appeals can still change it

What to look at

Identity & CV

  • Correct name and seat
  • Education and career claims that can be verified
  • Conflicting dates or titles

Sources · Government gazettes · Universities, professional bodies

A typo in a biography is not fraud. Look for a pattern, or a claim that mattered to their election.

Track record & delivery

  • Attendance and contributions in Parliament or the state assembly
  • Promises traced to completed projects
  • Audit findings in areas they ran

Sources · Hansard and DUN records · Auditor-General reports and dashboard · Ministry and agency releases

Announcements are not delivery. Follow a promise through budget, tender, construction and outcome.

Integrity & legal matters

  • Charges, convictions, acquittals and their dates
  • MACC statements about the person
  • Civil suits where they are a party

Sources · MACC (SPRM) statements · Court judgments · Reputable news follow-ups

Being questioned as a witness, or named in someone else's case, is not being accused.

Money & conflicts of interest

  • Company directorships and shareholdings
  • Roles in government-linked companies
  • Links between their businesses and contracts or licences they could influence

Sources · SSM company records · GLC annual reports · Tender and award notices

Owning a company is normal. A conflict needs a real link between their private interest and a public decision.

Party & political alignment

  • Which parties and coalitions they have been part of
  • The reasons they gave for switching
  • Whether their positions stayed consistent

Sources · Party records · News archives with their own statements

Switching parties is a political fact, not misconduct. Judge the reasons and the consistency.

Promises & positions

  • What they promise now
  • What they said and voted for before
  • Whether the promise is costed and within the powers of the office

Sources · Manifestos · Hansard votes and speeches · Interviews

Compare like with like — a state assembly member cannot deliver a federal policy alone.

Spotting a real conflict of interest

  1. Candidate
    holds a role or shares
  2. Company
    that bids for or holds
  3. Contract or licence
    decided or influenced by
  4. Their public office
A conflict needs every link in the chain, backed by records. Owning a business alone is not one.

Assessing a party

Your vote elects a person, but it also helps a party or coalition form a government.

  1. 1

    Record in government

    Where the party has governed — federally or in any state — what changed? Use official statistics, not the party's own summary.

  2. 2

    Manifesto realism

    Are the big promises costed, legal, and within the powers of the office being contested?

  3. 3

    Who they field

    The party is only as good as its candidates. Apply the candidate checks to the people it puts on your ballot.

  4. 4

    Coalition & stability

    Who are its partners, and how have past coalitions held together? Your vote may help form a government with them.

  5. 5

    Openness

    Does it publish its finances, hold internal elections and answer questions in public?

Red flags — and things that aren’t

Take seriously

  • A conviction, especially for corruption or abuse of power
  • Serious charges still unresolved, with no explanation from the candidate
  • A CV claim that is false and that they relied on
  • Repeated Auditor-General findings in a portfolio they controlled
  • A business link to contracts or licences they could influence, not disclosed
  • Contradicting their own past positions without explaining why

Not a red flag on its own

  • Switching parties
  • Being investigated or questioned (until charged)
  • Being named in someone else's case
  • What a relative or associate did
  • Their ethnicity, religion or background
  • An anonymous accusation or viral screenshot

Misinformation traps

Forwarded messages

Anything without a named source and a link is grade E. Ask: who said this first, and where?

Deepfakes

Audio and video can be faked convincingly. Look for the same clip from a reputable outlet before trusting it.

Old news, new outrage

Check the date. Stories resurface at election time without their ending — the charge that was later dropped.

Same name, different person

Malaysian names repeat. Match the seat, the party or the photo before connecting a story to a candidate.

Headlines only

The headline says “linked to scandal”; paragraph nine says “not a suspect”. Read to the end.

Partisan dressed as neutral

Pages and “independent” portals run by parties or their supporters. Check who publishes it.

Official sources

Put it into practice

Look up the candidates in your seat, pin the evidence that matters to you, and record your reasoning in your private notebook.

Ask the guide

An AI assistant that follows this guide and can look up Duede's published records. It won't tell you who to vote for, and it can make mistakes — check the records it links to.

Ask how to apply the guide — or about a specific candidate or seat.